The Expert Witness Handbook Revised 3rd Edition Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant edition by Dan Poynter Professional Technical eBooks
Download As PDF : The Expert Witness Handbook Revised 3rd Edition Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant edition by Dan Poynter Professional Technical eBooks 
Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant
Advice • Explanations • Guidelines • Checklists • Examples • Resources
The Expert Witness Handbook Revised 3rd Edition Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant edition by Dan Poynter Professional Technical eBooks
This is a frustrating book. On the one hand, there is some decent information here. However, it is very clear that the author did not spend much time thinking about how to communicate that information. This really just feels like a first pass outline/data dump which then should have been revised, edited and revised again. I will list a few of the problems below, but this is not a complete list.First, the overall structure just seems to ramble along without a real plan of building from one section to the next.
Second, within sections it seems like topics just change in the middle of the section. I found myself reading some sections two or three times trying to figure out what connecting theme I was missing. I finally asked others to look at some of these sections (without any other prompting) and found that they could not figure out what was going on either.
Third, information is often repetitive across sections. A point will be covered once and then later covered again without any reference to the prior discussion and without any further insights.
Fourth, paragraphs are sometimes repeated almost verbatim. For example, a paragraph may occur at the beginning of a section and then again near the end with almost no change. My guess is that the author was moving things around in a quick edit and/or tossing it down either place it could work with the idea of returning to it later.
Fifth, the book uses bold faced paraphrases or quotes from other sources at the bottom of each page. I guess these are a clever way to show others have a similar view without really needing to work it smoothly into the text. However, they often are redundant (in the first chapter one page has a quote saying going to trial without an expert is on the edge of malpractice, two pages later there is a similar comment that says it is malpractice - both are from the same magazine). Worse, the references provided in no way allow a reader to go find the source and look at it for themselves. For example, if a magazine is cited there is neither date given nor a title of the article. It might have been quick, but it was not the most useful for readers.
Moving away from the specifics, I guess this shows how the author could write "over 100 books" as it says in his bio. I did find it strange that he kept stressing how careful we need to be in writing reports, yet he did such a sloppy job here.
To be fair (and why it got two stars instead of one) there is some useful information in here if you are willing to skim through and not get hung up on the flow. In the end, this is probably one or two decent articles of information if it was put together well, not a whole book. Of course, this is also cheaper than a lot of the other "comprehensive" books on being an expert witness.
Would I buy it again? No, but I would check it out of the library to take a quick look.
Product details
|
Tags : Buy The Expert Witness Handbook, Revised 3rd Edition: Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant: Read 20 Kindle Store Reviews - Amazon.com,ebook,Dan Poynter,The Expert Witness Handbook, Revised 3rd Edition: Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant,Para Publishing,LAW General,LAW Legal Services
People also read other books :
- A Love Story Reversed 1898 eBook Edward Bellamy
- Think and Grow Rich Napoleon Hill 9781518749964 Books
- Dictionary of the Holy Quran Arabic English Abdul Mannan Omar 9780976697282 Books
- Video Game Plotline Tester The Dark Herbalist Book #1 LitRPG series eBook Michael Atamanov
- From SwnYMor to Seattle Nicko Rugby Odyssey eBook Mike Nicholas Gary Slater Jim Mills
The Expert Witness Handbook Revised 3rd Edition Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant edition by Dan Poynter Professional Technical eBooks Reviews
Dan Poynter's book, "The Expert Witness Handbook" tends to be a very practical, useful book for prepping experts across fields to provide expert testimony in a concise, logical, authoritative manner. This isn't the best book specifically for mental health practitioners, but, it makes numerous invaluable points. I think that it is well worth the time and money. A.
Great insight into the expert witness business. Easy to read and gets right down to the subject at hand. The consultant agreement in the book is worth the price of the book. There are no wasted pages.
Richard Graves
Ft. Lauderdale
Thank you very much this ebook was very informative. I wish I had read it a couple of years ago....but it is never to late or so they say.
Expert Witness Cosmetology Susan Maccoy [...]
Dan Poynter's "Expert Witness Handbook" is a terrific resource, especially for the newbie expert who is trying to break into the business of litigation support and expert witnessing. He leads the reader through all phases of the craft - ranging from marketing and promotion to pointers on testifying.
Seasoned expert witnesses may find this pabulum, but for the majority of expert witnesses it will serve as a very useful tool in launching and building an expert witness practice!
The Expert Witness Handbook covers a lot of ground, from selecting the expert and impeaching opposing experts, to being deposed and giving trial testimony. The author is evidently well versed and very experienced in being an expert, and his opinions and anecdotes are laced through the book. This is both the strength and weakness of the book - the author's expertise in parachute accidents shows, but it also limits the overall usefulness. The repetition and poor grammar are more annoying. Because this book was published by the author, the lack of editing may be somewhat anticipated. Overall, I enjoyed the book and found it useful, but a good editor could have tightened it up a lot.
While no book can substitute for experience, this is the best prep book I've found on the topic. A courtroom is a high pressure environment with attorneys and lying experts slinging mud and trying to discredit you. Good cross-training would be kickboxing and speaker training at toastmasters )
This book helped me prepare for a deposition. The questions and sample answers were very helpful to me. There were several good recommendations to avoid pitfalls and traps. The insight into what types of questions might be attempts to discredit the witness and the form and types of questions to answer carefully was so helpful. There are also a few humorous answers. I felt that this book gave me some good tools and ideas for answering tough questions about experiences and how to deflect and reinterpret a question to the witnesses favor.
This is a frustrating book. On the one hand, there is some decent information here. However, it is very clear that the author did not spend much time thinking about how to communicate that information. This really just feels like a first pass outline/data dump which then should have been revised, edited and revised again. I will list a few of the problems below, but this is not a complete list.
First, the overall structure just seems to ramble along without a real plan of building from one section to the next.
Second, within sections it seems like topics just change in the middle of the section. I found myself reading some sections two or three times trying to figure out what connecting theme I was missing. I finally asked others to look at some of these sections (without any other prompting) and found that they could not figure out what was going on either.
Third, information is often repetitive across sections. A point will be covered once and then later covered again without any reference to the prior discussion and without any further insights.
Fourth, paragraphs are sometimes repeated almost verbatim. For example, a paragraph may occur at the beginning of a section and then again near the end with almost no change. My guess is that the author was moving things around in a quick edit and/or tossing it down either place it could work with the idea of returning to it later.
Fifth, the book uses bold faced paraphrases or quotes from other sources at the bottom of each page. I guess these are a clever way to show others have a similar view without really needing to work it smoothly into the text. However, they often are redundant (in the first chapter one page has a quote saying going to trial without an expert is on the edge of malpractice, two pages later there is a similar comment that says it is malpractice - both are from the same magazine). Worse, the references provided in no way allow a reader to go find the source and look at it for themselves. For example, if a magazine is cited there is neither date given nor a title of the article. It might have been quick, but it was not the most useful for readers.
Moving away from the specifics, I guess this shows how the author could write "over 100 books" as it says in his bio. I did find it strange that he kept stressing how careful we need to be in writing reports, yet he did such a sloppy job here.
To be fair (and why it got two stars instead of one) there is some useful information in here if you are willing to skim through and not get hung up on the flow. In the end, this is probably one or two decent articles of information if it was put together well, not a whole book. Of course, this is also cheaper than a lot of the other "comprehensive" books on being an expert witness.
Would I buy it again? No, but I would check it out of the library to take a quick look.
0 Response to "[NCU]≫ PDF The Expert Witness Handbook Revised 3rd Edition Tips and Techniques for the Litigation Consultant edition by Dan Poynter Professional Technical eBooks"
Post a Comment